Huntingtons’s Concept and Its Applicability to the Contemporary World Essay

Introduction Globalization and the contract in the politics has entered a radical semi policy-making schema after the introduction warfare II and as such, it is has pinched the interest of political theorists who had hoped to re-define and predict the prospective outcomes of global politics. Among the different approaches, what had really attracted the attendance of the media and the interested crowd is Huntingtons plan on the impact of Civilizations theory.Huntingtons stereotypical claims and predictions regarding proximo outcomes of global relations had uncannily matched with that of the drastic event of the Al-Qaedas round off on September 11 on the Twin Towers. The event, which had caught global attention, is say to have been a direct pop-out from Huntingtons essay and that event was resultant of the collision surrounded by the differing cultures of the the Statesn superpower and the Muslims of Afghanistan. The heathenish conflict, albeit on global scale, would be the political pattern after the Cold War.The nous is, is Huntingtons concept still relevant with the current foreshorten of globalization? hither at that place is a basic conjecture that conflicts modernize from ethnic differences and it is on these differences which leave behind feed the upcoming antagonism among the different nations. Al-Qaedas attack may have been likely accidental and that his reasons were not purely ethnic as in Huntingtons theory. In the paper, there is an attempt to investigate the flaws of Huntingtons detrition of Civilizations when placed in the larger mount of globalization and international conflict.A positive understanding of his paper first must(prenominal) be placated followed by criticisms and the more(prenominal) apt(predicate) model that would fit the current trend for global political system. s The Clash of Civilizations is a theory proposed by political scientist Samuel P. Huntington in 1993 as a response to Fukuyamas book. Herein, Huntington expanded on the sack of global patterns after the Cold War from the economic to traditional whereby conflicts are more of culture hit.The globalization trend would purpose in the traditional cultural find and pull up stakes no longer be confounded on ideological clashes as in the philosophcal claims before. Huntingtons thesis is relatively simple to understand in the style that he had oversimplified and reduced everything It is my hypothesis that the perfect root of conflict in this overbold world lead not be to begin with ideological or primarily economic. The great divisions among humankind and the dominating tooth root of conflict will be cultural. terra firma states will remain the most hefty actors in world affairs, but the lead conflicts of global politics will issue forth between nations and groups of different civilizations. The clash of civilizations will dominate global politics. The fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future. His basic premise is the culture clash as a primary source of conflict and he divided the formal into different ethnic groups representing the different civilizations, for each one embodying different religion African, Hindu, Western, Sinic, Orthodox, Islamic, Latin America and Japanese.From these different ethnic frontiers, will arise the future conflicts and he had cited the cases of India and Pakistan. What is most scare off of his perceptions is that the Superpower of America will present a decline and the shift will be on the combined powers of Sino-Islamic group. equally daunting is Huntingtons concept that what had render this antagonism is the purposive role of teology in the different civilizations, most particularly, that of the Islams.